From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:54:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:54:00 -0500 Received: from smtp-out-1.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.188]:64195 "EHLO mel-rto1.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:53:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:53:27 +0100 From: wwp To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: low latency & preemtible kernels Message-Id: <20020227085327.74a2ed0c.subscript@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <200202261918.53190.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> In-Reply-To: <200202261918.53190.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Organization: - X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.2claws7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Okay, I would like to thank everyone who has answered my newbie question! It has helped, making the differences between lo-latency and preempt patches more clear to me :-) Regards -- wwp