public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5: preemptive kernel on UP
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:43:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020305004325.C32309@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1015287099.865.3.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <1015287099.865.3.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:11:23PM -0500

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:11:23PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> During 2.5.5-pre, an optimization was made that removed schedule_tail
> from UP kernels.  This causes the initial preempt_count of a new task,
> which starts at 1, to never decrement to zero and thus never become
> preemptible.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who pointed out the lousy performance - it took
> awhile to find but it should be fixed now.  Please comment if not.
> 
> Patch is against 2.5.6-pre2 and is critical for all UP+preempt users.
> 
> 	Robert Love
> 
> diff -urN linux-2.5.6-pre2/arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S linux/arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S
> --- linux-2.5.6-pre2/arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S	Fri Mar  1 17:21:14 2002
> +++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S	Mon Mar  4 17:49:27 2002
> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
>  	ret	$31,($26),1
>  .end alpha_switch_to
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_PREEMPT

Surely you really don't mean this?

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-05  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-05  0:11 [PATCH] 2.5: preemptive kernel on UP Robert Love
2002-03-05  0:43 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-03-05  0:51   ` Robert Love
2002-03-05  0:53     ` Russell King
2002-03-05  0:58       ` Robert Love
2002-03-05  1:55         ` Alan Cox
2002-03-05  1:43           ` Robert Love
2002-03-05  4:40             ` Ben Clifford
2002-03-05  1:56           ` yodaiken
2002-03-06 19:17 ` george anzinger
2002-03-06 20:21   ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020305004325.C32309@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox