public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.6-pre2 IDE cleanup 16
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 22:46:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020305224650.A1123@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16i9mc-00043p-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au> <3C84A34E.6060708@evision-ventures.com> <3C84AE16.A7F1ECCA@redhat.com> <20020305221933.A405@ucw.cz> <3C853BC9.EC553363@mandrakesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C853BC9.EC553363@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:42:33PM -0500

On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:42:33PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> > Note that taskfiles are not being removed from IDE. Just direct (and
> > parsed and filtered) interface to userspace. Does the scsi midlayer
> > export the SCBs directly to userspace?
> 
> It should.
> 
> I think it's a mistake to remove the taskfile interface.
> 
> It provides a way for people to directly validate the lowest level IDE
> interface, without interference from upper layers.  It also provides
> access to userspace for important features that -should not- be in the
> kernel, like SMART monitoring and security features.

Well, Martin promised to reimplement it better later if there is demand
for it, and it seems there is. So I suppose it's going away only to be
replaced by something better.

There was a flamewar about this some time ago - whether the kernel
should or should not parse the taskfile access to prevent possibly
dangerous commands sent to the drive - if this is to be used for
validation, then all commands need to be allowed, which also will enable
to thin the code considerably.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-05 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-05  7:54 [PATCH] per-cpu areas Rusty Russell
2002-03-05 10:51 ` [PATCH] 2.5.6-pre2 IDE cleanup 16 Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:07   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-05 11:28     ` Jens Axboe
2002-03-05 11:54       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 12:04         ` Jens Axboe
2002-03-05 12:09           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  0:33         ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06  9:51           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:48     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  0:34       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-05 12:36     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-05 12:36       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 12:35         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06  0:28         ` Alan Cox
2002-03-05 12:47       ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-05 12:52         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  1:40           ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06  8:56             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06  9:43             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  0:27       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 10:15         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:37   ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-05 11:51     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 21:19     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-03-05 21:42       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-05 21:46         ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2002-03-06  9:19           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  1:08       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06  9:45         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06  0:41   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06  9:15     ` benh
2002-03-06 11:07       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 11:12         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06 11:59           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 12:02         ` Meelis Roos
2002-03-06 12:11           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 16:01         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-06 20:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-06 17:00         ` benh
2002-03-06  9:49     ` Martin Dalecki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-06 13:46 Ronnie Sahlberg
2002-03-13 15:55 Rick A. Hohensee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020305224650.A1123@ucw.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox