public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
Cc: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@drgw.net>,
	The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University 
	<opensource-admin@cis.ohio-state.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:56:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020306085646.F15303@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org> <20020305163809.D1682@altus.drgw.net> <20020305165123.V12235@work.bitmover.com> <20020306095434.B6599@borg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020306095434.B6599@borg.org>; from kentborg@borg.org on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:54:34AM -0500

On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:51:23PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > BitKeeper is a non-trivial project, it has:
> > 	* close to 200 commands, with about 800 different options.
> 
> When I was recently doing some PPC work I used Bitkeeper (because PPC
> folks do) and I didn't like it.  It was so complicated to use, hell,
> seemed like there were 200 commands with 800 options.  And when I
> couldn't get it to correctly export a tree I couldn't tell if I was
> doing it wrong or it was a bug.

And apparently you didn't file a bug because I just looked in the bug
database.  Was typing "bk sendbug" too difficult?

> I can appreciate that the problem BK tries to solve is a big one with
> subtleties that have to get done right, and, as I type this on my
> notebook sitting in front of my work computer, I wish CVS were
> distributed.  But I am not convinced BK is as elegant in its design as
> it could be, I *know* it is not as elegant in its user interface as it
> could be.

There are *lots* of things in BK that aren't as good as they could be.
If you want them better, you need to complain about them.

> I also dislike the irony of BK being proprietary.  Sure, they might
> have an enlightened and generous attitude not, but PGP used to be
> free, then it became kinda free and then it became orphaned.  Luckily
> GPG came along, luckily PGP didn't have a monoploy on our history.

PGP didn't have a business model, we do, and part of our business model
is to give it away to some of the world.  It's a good business model,
BK is dramatically better because the PPC team used it and Cort went
through all sorts of stuff as BK improved.  BK would easily be a year
back in terms of usefulness if it weren't for Cort and there is no way
he would have been using it if we charged for it.  We get something by
letting people use it for free.  It's part of our business model and
it works.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-06 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-05 21:52 Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University
2002-03-05 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-05 22:38 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-03-06  0:51   ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-06 14:54     ` Kent Borg
2002-03-06 16:56       ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-03-06 22:13         ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-07 16:17           ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-03-07 19:54             ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-07 20:15               ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-07 20:38                 ` yodaiken
2002-03-07 21:05                 ` [opensource] " michael bernstein
2002-03-07 21:07                   ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-07 21:24                     ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-07 22:44                       ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-07 23:08                         ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of Alan Cox
2002-03-07 23:04                           ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-08  4:12                     ` Open Source should stand on its own two legs Mark Mielke
2002-03-07 21:41                   ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers yodaiken
2002-03-07 22:01                   ` John Jasen
2002-03-07 22:17                   ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07 23:21                   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-13  2:31                     ` Petro
2002-03-08  2:38                   ` Rusty Russell
2002-03-07 20:50               ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-03-07 20:53                 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-07 21:23                 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-07 21:42                   ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07 21:47                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-07 20:50               ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-07 21:12                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07 21:15                   ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-07 22:28                   ` Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by LinuxMaintainers Andrew Morton
2002-03-07 22:47                     ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-07 22:56                       ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-15  6:45                     ` kgdb for 2.4 and 2.5, now in BK Jeff Garzik
2002-03-07 21:47                 ` Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers Andrew Morton
2002-03-07 21:58                   ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-07 21:58                   ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07 22:08                   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-07 22:46                 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-07 22:42             ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-07 19:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-07 19:32             ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-07 20:12             ` george anzinger
2002-03-07 21:37             ` kernel debuggers (was Bitkeeper Bashing) Jeff V. Merkey
2002-03-05 22:41 ` Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers Jeff V. Merkey
2002-03-05 22:40   ` [opensource] " Colin Walters
2002-03-05 22:54     ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement ofBitKeeper " Jeff Garzik
2002-03-05 23:06       ` Colin Walters
2002-03-05 23:11       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-03-06  0:09       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-03-06  2:23       ` Karl
2002-03-06  3:35         ` michael bernstein
2002-03-07  1:22       ` David Schwartz
2002-03-05 23:01     ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper " Mike Fedyk
2002-03-05 23:14       ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-05 23:25         ` David Lang
2002-03-06 20:46         ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-06 21:07           ` Chris Friesen
2002-03-07  2:35           ` Petro
2002-03-05 23:16       ` David Lang
2002-03-05 23:19       ` Colin Walters
2002-03-05 23:36       ` Michael Bernstein
2002-03-05 23:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-05 23:57           ` That Linux Guy
2002-03-06  0:02         ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-03-06  1:05         ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-06  1:22           ` Dave Jones
2002-03-06  1:46             ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-06  1:50               ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-06  1:59                 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-06  2:19                 ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-06 16:08         ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07  1:27         ` David Schwartz
2002-03-07  1:34           ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07  2:33             ` Petro
2002-03-07  7:06               ` Rob Turk
2002-03-09 16:12       ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeepe Kai Henningsen
2002-03-06 16:04     ` [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers Rik van Riel
2002-03-06 19:46       ` Colin Walters
2002-03-06 20:12         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-06 20:24           ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-06 20:57       ` David S. Miller
2002-03-06 21:12         ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-06 21:15           ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-06 21:25         ` Evan Powers
2002-03-05 22:50   ` Kilobug
2002-03-05 23:29   ` Stephen Samuel
     [not found]     ` <004301c1c4a6$ab218340$b0d3fea9@pcs686>
2002-03-08  1:39       ` Stephen Samuel
2002-03-08  2:25         ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-08  3:32         ` yodaiken
2002-03-08  4:35           ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-08  7:56         ` Sean Hunter
2002-03-06  2:23   ` Karl
2002-03-06  3:47     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-03-06  3:40       ` [opensource] " michael bernstein
2002-03-06  5:04         ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-03-05 23:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06  0:11   ` [opensource] " Colin Walters
2002-03-06  6:11     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06  7:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-06 15:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-07  9:15   ` Pau Aliagas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-05 22:33 rddunlap
     [not found] <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <3C8543CC.A6017F76@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-03-06  9:40   ` Andi Kleen
2002-03-06 10:17     ` Dave Jones
2002-03-06 14:48       ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-03-06 15:59         ` yodaiken
2002-03-06 13:26     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-03-06 14:30       ` Roman Zippel
2002-03-06 17:00         ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-06 18:11           ` Roman Zippel
2002-03-07  4:27             ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-03-07 16:51           ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-03-07 17:26             ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-07 17:39               ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 10:07             ` Matthias Andree
2002-03-07 18:02 Jean-Luc Leger
2002-03-07 18:33 ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-07 18:10 Nicholas Berry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020306085646.F15303@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=hozer@drgw.net \
    --cc=kentborg@borg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opensource-admin@cis.ohio-state.edu \
    --cc=opensource@cis.ohio-state.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox