From: Oskar Liljeblad <oskar@osk.mine.nu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: directory notifications lost after fork?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 22:08:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020310210802.GA1695@oskar> (raw)
The code snipper demonstrates what I consider a bug in the
dnotify facilities in the kernel. After a fork, all registered
notifications are lost in the process where they originally
where registered (the parent process). "lost" here means that
the signal specified with F_SETSIG fcntl no longer is delivered
when notified.
How to reproduce (tested with 2.4.17):
gcc -o dnoticebug dnoticebug.c
dnoticebug & # run in background
cat dnoticebug.c >/dev/null # "notified" should now be printed
cat dnoticebug.c >/dev/null # nothing is printed this time
If you comment out the line with fork below, "notified" *will* be
printed every time you cat dnoticebug.c.
I'm not subscribed to the list so I'd appreciate if you CCed me.
(Otherwise I'd have to use the archives :) Thanks.
Oskar Liljeblad (oskar@osk.mine.nu)
===
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static void handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *data)
{
printf("notified\n");
}
int main(void)
{
struct sigaction act;
int fd;
act.sa_sigaction = handler;
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
sigaction(SIGRTMIN, &act, NULL);
fd = open(".", O_RDONLY);
fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, SIGRTMIN);
fcntl(fd, F_NOTIFY, DN_ACCESS|DN_MULTISHOT);
while (1) {
pause();
if (fork() <= 0) exit(0);
wait(NULL);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-10 21:08 Oskar Liljeblad [this message]
2002-03-11 7:41 ` directory notifications lost after fork? Alex Riesen
2002-03-12 12:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-11 8:50 ` Oskar Liljeblad
2002-03-11 10:20 ` Alex Riesen
2002-03-11 10:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-03-12 1:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 2:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-03-12 4:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] <20020311122701.A9718@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com>
2002-03-11 19:34 ` Alex Riesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-12 1:47 Malte Starostik
2002-03-12 12:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-12 16:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-12 17:21 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020310210802.GA1695@oskar \
--to=oskar@osk.mine.nu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox