public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Scott L. Burson" <gyro@zeta-soft.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue on dual Athlon MP
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:32:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020311093217.GB31108@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15494.32860.773969.762627@kali.zeta-soft.com> <E16j7Yh-0004CL-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16j7Yh-0004CL-00@the-village.bc.nu>

On Thu, Mar 07 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > BTW, this doesn't seem like a preemption issue, considering that throughput
> > is very definitely affected as well as latency.
> > 
> > Anyway, please let me know if there's anything I can do, within my
> > constraints, to help.  (As you can guess, though, I don't have any kernel
> > debugging experience.)
> 
> It sounds like the hit you are taking is from highmem and I/O (having to
> copy pages lower into memory so the I/O subsystem can use them). Some of
> that is in the hard to fix for 2.4 category with the x86. There are some
> experimental patches around but they are experimental.

If you are referring to my block-highmem patch, then it's not considered
too experiemental anymore. It's been a long time since any problems have
been reported.

Scott, a small profile run would give us the information needed to tell
whether this is a bounce problem or not. Boot the kernel with profile=2,
then do a readprofile -r ; run problematic stuff ; readprofile >
prof_data

and share the prof_data.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-03-11  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-06 19:28 Performance issue on dual Athlon MP Dieter Nützel
2002-03-06 20:49 ` John Jasen
2002-03-07 23:20 ` Scott L. Burson
2002-03-07 23:44   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08  0:24     ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-03-11  9:32     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-03-11 20:13       ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-03-14 15:49       ` Scott L. Burson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-06 22:09 rwhron
2002-03-06 18:47 Scott L. Burson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020311093217.GB31108@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gyro@zeta-soft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox