From: wli@holomorphy.com
To: wli@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, andrea@suse.de,
"Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com,
hch@infradead.org, phillips@bonn-fries.net
Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre2aa1
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:31:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020312053152.D687@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020312041958.C687@holomorphy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020312041958.C687@holomorphy.com>; from wli@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:19:58AM +0000
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:19:58AM +0000, wli@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> http://www.samba.org/~anton/linux/pagecache/pagecache_before.png
>
> is a histogram of the pagecache hash function's bucket distribution
> on an SMP ppc64 machine after some benchmark run.
>
> http://www.samba.org/~anton/linux/pagecache/pagecache_after.png
>
> has a histogram of a Fibonacci hashing hash function's bucket
> distribution on the same machine after an identical benchmark run.
akpm just pointed out to me these histograms are not quite the best
comparisons as the tables differ in size. I'll get something webabble
soon with head-to-head comparisons. OTOH the general nature of things
should be clear and the behavior of that hash function visible.
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-12 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-12 4:19 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-12 5:31 ` wli [this message]
2002-03-12 6:36 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 6:06 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 10:46 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-03-12 11:47 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 11:48 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-12 12:21 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-12 14:25 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 14:32 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-15 17:20 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Horst von Brand
2002-03-15 16:43 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 11:29 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-12 12:56 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 13:20 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-03-12 13:33 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-12 14:17 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-12 14:30 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-13 2:18 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-13 19:06 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-13 22:10 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-14 12:18 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-14 12:47 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-14 13:59 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-03-14 14:02 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-12 14:14 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-12 15:04 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 23:31 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-13 0:09 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrew Morton
2002-03-13 1:06 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 wli
2002-03-13 1:24 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrew Morton
2002-03-13 7:37 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-13 7:30 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-13 7:55 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrew Morton
2002-03-13 8:06 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-13 10:57 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-13 13:51 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-03-13 14:03 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-13 19:19 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrew Morton
2002-03-13 8:12 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-08 2:40 2.4.19pre2aa1 rwhron
2002-03-07 8:21 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-07 10:49 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-03-07 11:27 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-07 11:47 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-03-07 11:46 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-03-07 17:03 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-07 20:18 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 William Lee Irwin III
2002-03-07 20:38 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-08 0:22 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-08 0:26 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 0:11 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-07 11:34 ` 2.4.19pre2aa1 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020312053152.D687@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=wli@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox