public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Helms <john.helms@photomask.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim.Trice@photomask.com (Trice Jim),
	Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: bug (trouble?) report on high mem support
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 20:32:46 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020315.20324600@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16lyLG-0004Zo-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16lyLG-0004Zo-00@the-village.bc.nu>

Alan,

Ok, how do I go about determining that?  The machine
I have is a brand-spankin' new IBM x-series 350 with
4 900MHz Xeon processors.  The system bios can 
recognize all of the 16320MB of memory at startup.
If those patches work, it will save our butts as
we have a major conversion project that hinges on
this.  

Thanks,
jwh

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/15/02, 2:30:22 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote regarding 
Re: bug (trouble?) report on high mem support:


> > Here is a top output.  We have 16Gb of ram.
> > I have also tried a 2.4.9-31 enterprise=20
> > kernel rpm from RedHat with the same=20
> > results.

> Ok that would make sense. Next question is do you have an I/O controller
> that can use all the 64bit address space on the PCI bus ?

> What is happening is that you are using a lot of CPU copying buffers down
> into lower memory to transfer to/from disk - as well probably as that
> causing a lot of competition for low memory. If your I/O controller can 
hit
> the full 64bit space there are some rather nice test patches that should
> completely obliterate the problem.

> Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-15 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-15 19:25 bug (trouble?) report on high mem support John Helms
2002-03-15 20:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-15 20:07   ` John Helms
2002-03-15 20:30     ` Alan Cox
2002-03-15 20:32       ` John Helms [this message]
2002-03-15 23:37         ` Mike Anderson
2002-03-15 23:38         ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-03-16  0:02           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-16  4:34             ` John Helms
2002-03-16  5:44               ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-18 21:45               ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020315.20324600@linux.local \
    --to=john.helms@photomask.com \
    --cc=Jim.Trice@photomask.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox