From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup port 0x80 use (was: Re: IO delay ...)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:57:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020315185722.GA920@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020315135240.A5979@wotan.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203151736460.1477-100000@biker.pdb.fsc.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203151736460.1477-100000@biker.pdb.fsc.net>
On Mar 15, 2002 18:41 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> +#define __SLOW_DOWN_IO_PORT 0x80
> +#define __SLOW_DOWN_IO "\noutb %%al,$0x80"
You may want to change the above to:
#define __SLOW_DOWN_IO_ASM "\noutb %%al,$__SLOW_DOWN_IO_PORT"
> + outb(3, __SLOW_DOWN_IO_PORT);
You may also want to replace the above entirely with a macro, like:
#define __SLOW_DOWN_IO outb(3, __SLOW_DOWN_IO_PORT)
so that on architectures that don't need/have this ISA nonsense can
just replace __SLOW_DOWN_IO with something else like udelay.
> --- ./arch/i386/boot/setup.S.orig Fri Mar 15 17:23:15 2002
> +++ ./arch/i386/boot/setup.S Fri Mar 15 18:33:12 2002
> @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@
> # ... and the former contents of CS
>
> DELTA_INITSEG = SETUPSEG - INITSEG # 0x0020
> +DELAY_PORT = __SLOW_DOWN_IO_PORT # port for IO delay (0x80)
>
> .code16
> .globl begtext, begdata, begbss, endtext, enddata, endbss
May as well just stick with a single define here (i.e. remove DELAY_PORT).
> @@ -1001,7 +1003,7 @@
>
> # Delay is needed after doing I/O
> delay:
> - outb %al,$0x80
> + outb %al,$DELAY_PORT
> ret
And use __SLOW_DOWN_IO_ASM here.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-15 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3C90E983.5AC769B8@ngforever.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203151243430.1477-100000@biker.pdb.fsc.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-03-15 11:51 ` IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes Andi Kleen
2002-03-15 12:47 ` Martin Wilck
2002-03-15 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2002-03-15 17:41 ` [PATCH] Cleanup port 0x80 use (was: Re: IO delay ...) Martin Wilck
2002-03-15 18:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-15 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-15 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-15 21:37 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-16 0:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-15 18:57 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2002-03-15 20:17 ` Martin Wilck
2002-03-17 2:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-18 9:18 ` Martin Wilck
2002-03-18 9:39 ` Keith Owens
2002-03-18 11:20 ` Martin Wilck
2002-03-18 15:22 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020315185722.GA920@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=Martin.Wilck@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox