Re: VFS mediator?

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

Hi!

> > > I have experimented with using NFS for that -- start a local daemon that
> > > exports a virtual filesystem and mount that. The great bonus is that it's
> > > platform independent -- it works on Solaris, HP-UX and even Ultrix just as
> > > well. Other projects have become more important, however, and I haven't
> > > finished it. If you're interested, drop me a line.
> > 
> > There are several of these and also some folks using the coda interface
> > to do the same work, as the coda interface is sometimes better suited. 
> 
> ... for some kinds of work.
> 
> First of all, "VFS mediator" is simply a userland filesystem.  That's
> precisely what it is - filesystem that talks to a process.  We've got
> quite a few of them and which one fits the task depends on the task.
> 
> 	* NFS (v2,v3):  Portable.  And that's the only good thing to say
> about it - it's stateless, it has messy semantics all over the place and
> implementing userland server requires a lot of glue.

Does not work... If you mount nfs server on localhost, you can deadlock.

> 	* CODA: nice if you want commit-on-close semantics and basically
> want a lot of regular files.  More or less portable, userland side doesn't
> require much glue.  Has a nice local caching and as the result bad for any
> RPC-style uses.

And the only one that works when r/w mounted on localhost.
									Pavel
-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa