From: Hank Leininger <linux-kernel@progressive-comp.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.2.20 oops during fsck, mylex 352 (DAC960), CONFIG_3GB
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:33:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200203202033.PAA18847@mailer.progressive-comp.com> (raw)
Are there any known issues with 2.2's deliberately-partially-disabled 3GB
physical-RAM support (#define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x40000000 in page_offset.h)
and either the DAC960 driver, or e2fsck v1.22 ?
I've ended up (because of a comedy of RMA-related errors) with 3 1GB DIMMs
for a new server, when I'd originally planned only 2. For several reasons
I'd like to stick to 2.2 for a bit longer. But to get 3GB support in 2.2 I
had to "complete" the CONFIG_3GB config option, and thinking that I knew
what I was doing, started smacking the box around. Everything seemed
solid, until I killed the box with 8k NFS (I think--was getting
>10mbytes/sec writes before the lockup though :). That's not the problem
I'm worrying about now, though :-P
Upon reboot+fsck, while I cursed myself for not yet having converted to
ext3, the box oops'ed. It isn't local to me and doesn't have a serial
console yet, so it was rebooted w/o recording the oops info.
Now, I'm *hoping* there's a known or easily-identifiable issue with either
the DAC960 driver, or (less likely) with e2fsck, when running with
PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x40000000. If so, then I'll take the doctor's advice and
won't do that. If not, then I may have *another* problem[1]. So, someone
please tell me this is a known problem ;) OTOH, glancing through source
for the DAC960 driver and for fsck I don't see anything that looks like it
would care about PAGE_OFFSET. And, CONFIG_2GB seems to be solid. Is
anyone running a similar configuration who has *not* had these problems?
[1] I will first suspect a hardware problem. This is all for a replacement
server to upgrade the one that runs MARC. In the 4 months since I
bought all the hardware, nearly half of the components--all high-end,
supposedly high-quality, certianly expensive--have failed, or were
simply DOA. I hate hardware.
Thanks,
Hank Leininger <hlein@progressive-comp.com>
reply other threads:[~2002-03-20 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200203202033.PAA18847@mailer.progressive-comp.com \
--to=linux-kernel@progressive-comp.com \
--cc=hlein@progressive-comp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox