Re: 2 questions about SCSI initialization

[Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>]

> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:26:35 -0800
> From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>

> > #2: What does  if (GET_USE_COUNT(tpnt->module) != 0)  do in
> > scsi_unregister_device? The circomstances are truly bizzare:
> > a) the error code is NEVER used
> > b) it can be called either from module unload.
> > I would like to kill that check.

>[...]
> If the count is really non zero, the function should not be called
> (rmmod won't call into it if the module is in use; if calling via
> scsi_register_device_module on failure, it should be impossible
> to increment count - it should be impossible to call sd_open or
> sg_open).

The last line of reasoning is faulty, because sys_init_module()
does  atomic_set(&mod->uc.usecount,1); before calling init_sg()
or init_sd(). Thus, it's not only possible, but it is guaranteed
that the counter is non-zero when control gets
to scsi_register_device_module, and to the failure path.

> --- scsi.c.orig	Thu Mar 21 13:51:27 2002
> +++ scsi.c	Thu Mar 21 13:52:54 2002
> @@ -2331,8 +2331,8 @@
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are busy, this is not going to fly.
>  	 */
> -	if (GET_USE_COUNT(tpnt->module) != 0)
> -		goto error_out;
> +	if (tpnt->module && (GET_USE_COUNT(tpnt->module) != 0))
> +		BUG();

Guaranteed to trigger BUG() is out_of_memory gets set.

I still think we better kill this check altogether.
Any more objections?

-- Pete