Re: Creating a per-task kernel space for kmap, user pagetables, et al

[Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:49:43PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:00:02PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Thet's another bit yes, but we'll need 200000 tasks to overflow the
> > lowmem (ignoring the fact the lowmem is shared also for the other lowmem
> > data structures) and there's the PID limit of 64k tasks. So I don't see
> > it as a major thing. Anyways if we really wanted to put the stack [and
> > task structure of course] in highmem, we could do that in two additional
> > entries after the user stack together with the two entries for the
> > pagecache and pagetable persistent kmaps. I think we can officially call
> > that area the "userfixmap" or "per-process-fixmap" (no matter if it's in
> > user or kernel space).  But it is much faster to keep the kernel stack
> > always in 4M global tlbs, thus I don't think we need to change that in
> > 2.5.  (also USB was used to do dma in the kernel stack, not sure if they
> > changed it recently)
> 
> Another (perhaps obvious) pitfall is stack-allocated storage used for
> components of globally-mapped structures. The premier example of this
> is probably waitqueues. To keep them working, dynamic allocation of
> globally-mapped storage or per-task static allocation thereof is
> required as a substitute.

Agreed, good point (in theory task struct could go there, I'm not
suggesting that of course, but stack has to remain visible to all MM for
such reason).

Andrea