public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
@ 2002-03-21 18:14 Stephen Williams
  2002-03-22  5:23 ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Williams @ 2002-03-21 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I can compile ac-5 fine but when trying to boot I get the following
error:

kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:790!
invalid operand: 0000

I am running 2.4.19pre3 without a problem.  I didn't have a way (as far
as I know) to get the full panic output but I can copy by hand and post
here if needed.

Have a good one,
Steve







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
  2002-03-21 18:14 Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Stephen Williams
@ 2002-03-22  5:23 ` Andre Hedrick
  2002-03-22  6:11   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 CaT
  2002-03-22  7:34   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andre Hedrick @ 2002-03-22  5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Williams; +Cc: linux-kernel

On 21 Mar 2002, Stephen Williams wrote:

> I can compile ac-5 fine but when trying to boot I get the following
> error:
> 
> kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:790!
> invalid operand: 0000
> 
> I am running 2.4.19pre3 without a problem.  I didn't have a way (as far
> as I know) to get the full panic output but I can copy by hand and post
> here if needed.
> 
> Have a good one,
> Steve

It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler
is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.

if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
     BUG();
ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);

If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never
called during a completion, and/or is dangling.  It is a typo my bad :-(

Edit and change it from "==" to "!="

Apology for the typo folks.

Cheers,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
  2002-03-22  5:23 ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
@ 2002-03-22  6:11   ` CaT
  2002-03-22  6:35     ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
  2002-03-22  7:34   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Dave Jones
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: CaT @ 2002-03-22  6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andre Hedrick; +Cc: Stephen Williams, linux-kernel

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler
> is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.
> 
> if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
>      BUG();
> ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);
> 
> If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never
> called during a completion, and/or is dangling.  It is a typo my bad :-(
> 
> Edit and change it from "==" to "!="

Now I'm confused. Should that be != to ==? :) And every instance I find?

-- 
SOCCER PLAYER IN GENITAL-BITING SCANDAL  ---  "It was something between
friends that I thought would have no importance until this morning when
I got up and saw all  the commotion in the news,"  Gallardo told a news
conference. "It stunned me."
Reyes told Marca that he had "felt a slight pinch."
      -- http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/1129soccer29-ON.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
  2002-03-22  6:11   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 CaT
@ 2002-03-22  6:35     ` Andre Hedrick
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andre Hedrick @ 2002-03-22  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: CaT; +Cc: Stephen Williams, linux-kernel


NO, just that one line 790

Cheers,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, CaT wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler
> > is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.
> > 
> > if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
> >      BUG();
> > ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);
> > 
> > If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never
> > called during a completion, and/or is dangling.  It is a typo my bad :-(
> > 
> > Edit and change it from "==" to "!="
> 
> Now I'm confused. Should that be != to ==? :) And every instance I find?
> 
> -- 
> SOCCER PLAYER IN GENITAL-BITING SCANDAL  ---  "It was something between
> friends that I thought would have no importance until this morning when
> I got up and saw all  the commotion in the news,"  Gallardo told a news
> conference. "It stunned me."
> Reyes told Marca that he had "felt a slight pinch."
>       -- http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/1129soccer29-ON.html
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
  2002-03-22  5:23 ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
  2002-03-22  6:11   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 CaT
@ 2002-03-22  7:34   ` Dave Jones
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2002-03-22  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andre Hedrick; +Cc: Stephen Williams, linux-kernel

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
 > if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
 > Edit and change it from "==" to "!="

What's wrong with this picture 8-)

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5
@ 2002-03-22 17:49 Stephen Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Williams @ 2002-03-22 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andre; +Cc: linux-kernel

Worked like a champ, thank's Andre!

Steve

From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:andre@linux-ide.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:24 PM
To: Stephen Williams
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5


On 21 Mar 2002, Stephen Williams wrote:

> I can compile ac-5 fine but when trying to boot I get the following
> error:
> 
> kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:790!
> invalid operand: 0000
> 
> I am running 2.4.19pre3 without a problem.  I didn't have a way (as
far
> as I know) to get the full panic output but I can copy by hand and
post
> here if needed.
> 
> Have a good one,
> Steve

It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt
handler
is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.

if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
     BUG();
ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);

If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else ,
never
called during a completion, and/or is dangling.  It is a typo my bad :-(

Edit and change it from "==" to "!="

Apology for the typo folks.

Cheers,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-22 17:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-21 18:14 Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Stephen Williams
2002-03-22  5:23 ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
2002-03-22  6:11   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 CaT
2002-03-22  6:35     ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Andre Hedrick
2002-03-22  7:34   ` Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Dave Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-22 17:49 Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 Stephen Williams

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox