From: Steven Walter <srwalter@yahoo.com>
To: Andre Pang <ozone@algorithm.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: Screen corruption in 2.4.18
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 01:16:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020324071604.GA15618@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203192112.WAA09721@jagor.srce.hr> <200203222204.XAA01121@jagor.srce.hr> <20020322232304.GA19579@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> <200203231526.QAA09302@jagor.srce.hr> <20020323160647.GA22958@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> <1016953516.189201.5912.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au>
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:05:16PM +1100, Andre Pang wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 10:06:47AM -0600, Steven Walter wrote:
>
> > > Don't get it wrong. I *do have* an VT8365. VT8365 (ProSavage KM133) is
> > > somewhat the same as VT8363 (KT133), except that 8365 has an integrated
> > > Savage graphics card (which *I use*).
> >
> > Aha... I see. And in thinking about it, I realize that my motherboard
> > also has this integrated graphics card. Perhaps this is the difference?
> > Unfortunately, it seems they both report the same PCI id, so I don't
> > really know of a way to differentiate them.
>
> I can verify Danijel's report -- I have the same setup
> (VT8363+VT8353, a.k.a. ProSavage KM133), and I experience the
> same screen corruption. Clearing only bit 7 of register 55 fixes
> the problem; clearing bits 5 and 6 causes the video to go all
> borky. There's been another thread about it on lkml over the
> last week or so.
>
> > I looked at that datasheet, and the datasheet for the 8363. Both said
> > not to program offset 55, and both said the bits we are clearing are
> > "reserved." Perhaps we should contact VIA directly, tell them the
> > problem we're having with their current fix, tell them our theory, and
> > ask if we're right.
>
> Heh, a VIA contact who knows what the hell that register does
> would be nice :).
>
> In the meantime, I'd probably suggest a patch which looks for
> clears only bit 7 of Rx55 if an 8363 and an 8365 is found. I'll
> whip one up later today.
Alright. Two seperate verifications are enough for me. I have a patch,
but had been sitting on it for the time. But, here it is. Comments are
welcome, I'd like to see this included in 2.4.x and 2.5.x
Thanks
--
-Steven
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-- George Orwell
He's alive. He's alive! Oh, that fellow at RadioShack said I was mad!
Well, who's mad now?
-- Montgomery C. Burns
--- pci-pc.c~ Sat Mar 23 15:01:37 2002
+++ pci-pc.c Sat Mar 23 15:03:45 2002
@@ -1197,16 +1197,19 @@
{
u8 v;
int where = 0x55;
+ int mask = 0x7f; /* Don't clear bits 5 and 6 on the KT133! It
+ * causes strange screen corruption... */
if (d->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8367_0) {
where = 0x95; /* the memory write queue timer register is
different for the kt266x's: 0x95 not 0x55 */
+ mask = 0x1f; /* clear bits 5, 6, 7 */
}
pci_read_config_byte(d, where, &v);
if (v & 0xe0) {
- printk("Disabling VIA memory write queue: [%02x] %02x->%02x\n", where, v, v & 0x1f);
- v &= 0x1f; /* clear bits 5, 6, 7 */
+ printk("Disabling VIA memory write queue: [%02x] %02x->%02x\n", where, v, v & mask);
+ v &= mask;
pci_write_config_byte(d, where, v);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-24 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-19 21:12 Screen corruption in 2.4.18 Danijel Schiavuzzi
2002-03-20 0:03 ` Steven Walter
[not found] ` <200203201506.QAA13795@jagor.srce.hr>
[not found] ` <20020320172516.GA14024@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org>
[not found] ` <200203211209.NAA11121@jagor.srce.hr>
2002-03-21 17:22 ` Steven Walter
[not found] ` <200203222204.XAA01121@jagor.srce.hr>
2002-03-22 23:23 ` Steven Walter
[not found] ` <200203231526.QAA09302@jagor.srce.hr>
2002-03-23 16:06 ` Steven Walter
[not found] ` <200203231741.SAA00071@jagor.srce.hr>
2002-03-23 18:26 ` VIA technical contact [was Screen corruption in 2.4.18] Steven Walter
2002-03-24 7:05 ` Screen corruption in 2.4.18 Andre Pang
2002-03-24 7:16 ` Steven Walter [this message]
[not found] ` <200203241231.g2OCV5X18426@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2002-03-24 15:59 ` [PATCH] " Steven Walter
2002-03-24 16:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 18:03 ` Steven Walter
2002-03-25 2:01 ` Andre Pang
2002-03-24 15:07 ` Danijel Schiavuzzi
2002-03-24 16:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 17:13 ` Danijel Schiavuzzi
2002-03-25 1:43 ` Andre Pang
2002-03-25 2:40 ` Steven Walter
2002-03-25 3:00 ` Andre Pang
2002-03-25 8:50 ` Marc Wilson
2002-03-25 17:07 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-03-25 21:02 ` Steven Walter
2002-03-25 21:19 ` Marc Wilson
2002-03-29 2:06 ` Andre Pang
2002-03-29 3:16 ` Marc Wilson
2002-03-25 1:55 ` Andre Pang
2002-03-25 19:52 ` Danijel Schiavuzzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020324071604.GA15618@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org \
--to=srwalter@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ozone@algorithm.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox