public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Peter Hartley <PDHartley@sonicblue.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	tytso@thunk.org, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Does e2fsprogs-1.26 work on mips?
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:07:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020325090717.A13707@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D1208A1C9BD511855B00D0B772242C011C7F13@corpmail1.sc.sonicblue.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:52:24AM -0800, Peter Hartley wrote:
> H J Lu wrote:
> > I look at the glibc code. It uses a constant RLIM_INFINITY for a given
> > arch. The user always passes (~0UL) to glibc on x86. glibc will check
> > if the kernel supports the new getrlimit at the run time. If it
> > doesn't, glibc will adjust the RLIM_INFINITY for setrlimit. I 
> > don't see
> > how glibc 2.2.5 compiled under kernel 2.2 will fail under 2.4 due to
> > this unless glibc is misconfigureed or miscompiled.
> 
> It's not a question of which kernel glibc is compiled under, it's a question
> of which version of the kernel headers (/usr/include/{linux,asm}) glibc is
> compiled against.
> 

What are you talking about? It doesn't matter which kernel header
is used. glibc doesn't even use /usr/include/asm/resource.h nor
should any user space applications.



H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-25 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-25 10:52 Does e2fsprogs-1.26 work on mips? Peter Hartley
2002-03-25 17:07 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-25 19:00 Peter Hartley
2002-03-25 19:11 ` H . J . Lu
     [not found] <20020323140728.A4306@lucon.org>
     [not found] ` <3C9D1C1D.E30B9B4B@zip.com.au>
     [not found]   ` <20020323221627.A10953@lucon.org>
     [not found]     ` <3C9D7A42.B106C62D@zip.com.au>
2002-03-24  9:28       ` H . J . Lu
2002-03-25  5:31         ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-25  5:43           ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-26  6:54             ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-26 10:51               ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-25 17:17           ` H . J . Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020325090717.A13707@lucon.org \
    --to=hjl@lucon.org \
    --cc=PDHartley@sonicblue.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=tytso@thunk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox