Re: [PATCH][RFC] P4/Xeon Thermal LVT support

Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-27T16:06:04Z

On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> You can't use a vector that is in the range assigned to I/O APIC
> interrupts (i.e. 0x31 - 0xee). Otherwise you'll get an overlap when the
> vector gets assigned to an ordinary IRQ line. Also you probably want a
> high-priority interrupt as the condition is serious, if not critical --
> system failures, such as bus exceptions, machine check faults, parity
> errors, power failures, etc. demand a high priority service.

Would f0 be ok? But i see its assigned for "future linux use"

Thanks,
Zwane

--