From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:28:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:27:59 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:5779 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:27:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:27:37 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5nsRullg=E5rd?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix alpha NR_SYSCALLS Message-ID: <20020328212737.B30037@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5nsRullg=E5rd?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200203211735.g2LHZFb02603@xq806.e.kth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:35:15PM +0100, MånsRullgård wrote: > -#define NR_SYSCALLS 378 > +#define NR_SYSCALLS 381 Actually, the correct value is 382. I've fixed this and added a compile-time check for correctness. r~