From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:44:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:44:43 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:3342 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:44:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 18:44:33 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.8-pre1 binutils-related regression on x86 Message-ID: <20020404184433.B11833@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Mikael Pettersson , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200204041633.SAA10837@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:33:24PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > - lcall *%cs:realmode_swtch > + lcall %cs:realmode_swtch > > jmp rmodeswtch_end > > The "*" was put there early in the 2.5 series, to allow non- > antique binutils to assemble the code cleanly without warnings. > This patch reintroduces those warnings. Uncool. GAR!, my bad. Most of the silly bits seem to stem from early 2.5 merges, hopefully there's not too many more sillies. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs