Re: faster boots?

[R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)]

Itai Nahshon wrote:
> On Sunday 07 April 2002 17:42 pm, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > I'm curios, how much work can you accomplish on your laptop
> > > without any disk access (but you still need to save files - keeping
> > > them in buffers until it's time to actually write them).
> >
> > Debugging session (emacs/gcc/gdb) for half an hour with disks stopped is
> > easy to accomplish.
> > 								Pavel
> 
> My suggestion was: there should _never_ be dirty blocks for disks that
> are not spinning. Flush all dirty buffers before spinning down, and spin-up
> on any operation that writes to the disk (and block that operation).
> 
> The opposite to that (which I do not like) processes create as many
> dirty buffers as they want and disk spins up only on sync() or when
> the system is starving for usable memory.
> 
> An aletrnate ides (more drastic) is that fle systems can mount internally
> read-only when a disk is spinned-down. Means - you cannot spin
> down when there is a file handle open for writing. Other than this there
> are advantages.

Actually, you can allow the spindown with open write-filehandles. You
have to remember to spin it up and remount r/w when activity happens.

I'd really like my systems to remount RO if ilde for long times. I
have a few systems that occasionally stop unexpectedly, and not having
to fsck the non-active filesystems would save a lot of time.

(I've decided I dislike reiser: It ate two of my sources, because I
crashed the machine before the sources hit the disk. But the metadata
had been updated to indicate that the overwritten source was in a
different spot on the disk than the old sources. Having to go back to
an older version is less bad than losing the source altogether. 

Yes, I could turn on data-loggin. Yes, I could type "sync" before
insmodding the new driver.)

			Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots.