public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux as a minicomputer ?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:12:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020411191249.A15435@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020411154601.GY17962@antefacto.com> <20020411164331.GR612@gallifrey> <20020411184923.A15238@ucw.cz> <1018544869.962.22.camel@psuedomode>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:07:44PM -0400, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:49, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:43:31PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * John P. Looney (john@antefacto.com) wrote:
> > > >  Sorry if this isn't the place for this question, but it's something that
> > > > came up in general office talk today.
> > > > 
> > > >  Many many moons ago, the GGI project promised us the ability to buy a
> > > > four-processor box, four PCI video cards, four USB mice & keyboards, and
> > > > let four people use that machine at once, with benefits all around.
> > > 
> > > <snip>
> > > 
> > > >  Are there any plans to bring this sort of functionality to Linux 2.6 ? As
> > > > I remember, some of the problems were that the GGI code was never going to
> > > > get into Linux proper, and enumeration of multiple keyboards and mice, but
> > > > I would have thought that was there a need, these problems would have been
> > > > fixed by now.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure, but I don't think any code is needed if you run X.  Bung
> > > four USB mice, four USB keyboards in and four video cards.  Write a
> > > separate X config for each one specifying which PCI card should be used
> > > and which mouse/keyboard device should be used.  Now start an X server
> > > for each one.
> > 
> > Doesn't work unfortunately. The separate Xservers stomp on each others
> > toes in the process. It works if you use fbcon (thus no acceleration, no
> > 3d), USB, and hack the X servers not to switch consoles, and take
> > keyboard input from /dev/input/event devices. But that's still far from
> > the desired state of things.
> why would they step on eachother's toes?  You tell each one to goto a
> separate vc and give each a separate identifier :2 vt8 :3 vt9 etc. If
> each one is using a separate video card, then they should all be able to
> run accelerated (no dri) and be fine.  

1) Only one VT can be active at a time. Even with multiple cards. Thus
only one X server will be active at a time, others will show a blank
screen.

2) If you hack out the VT switching out of X, then still each X server
will disable all PCI resources for other video cards, because it
believes it owns the system. This will freeze all other active X
servers.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-11 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-11 15:46 linux as a minicomputer ? John P. Looney
2002-04-11 16:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-04-11 16:49   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-11 17:07     ` Ed Sweetman
2002-04-11 17:12       ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
     [not found]         ` <3CB69032.D332FA51@aitel.hist.no>
2002-04-12  8:08           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-11 17:09     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-04-11 17:13       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-11 17:49         ` John P. Looney
2002-04-11 17:59           ` Rene Rebe
2002-04-11 18:46             ` James Simmons
2002-04-11 19:06             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-12  7:41               ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-12  8:09                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-11 18:01           ` James Simmons
2002-04-11 19:07           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-13 19:03       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-11 19:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-11 20:05   ` James Simmons
2002-04-12  7:31     ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-13 18:56   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-13 19:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-13 19:37       ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-13 19:40         ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-13 19:49           ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-13 22:08             ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-13 23:46               ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-13 19:51       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-13 19:36         ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-14  4:30         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-14 13:45           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-14 16:44             ` Sten
2002-04-14 16:50               ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-04-14 20:20                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-15 16:05                 ` Thomas Molina
2002-04-15  0:37             ` Rob Landley
2002-04-15  8:46               ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-15  9:10               ` Alan Cox
     [not found]               ` <3CBB522C.8070704@bcgreen.com>
2002-04-15 18:09                 ` Rob Landley
2002-04-14  2:35       ` ux " jw schultz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-11 17:42 linux " Ivan Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020411191249.A15435@ucw.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
    --cc=gilbertd@treblig.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox