From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk
Cc: ak@suse.de, taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:31:50 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020412.143150.74519563.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020412222252.A25184@kushida.apsleyroad.org>
From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 22:22:52 +0100
I'm not advocating more locking in read() -- there's no need, and it is
quite important that it is fast! But I would very much appreciate an
understanding of the rules that relate reading, writing and truncating
processes. How much ordering & atomicity can I depend on? Anything at all?
Basically none it appears :-)
If you need to depend upon a consistent snapshot of what some other
thread writes into a file, you must have some locking protocol to use
to synchronize with that other thread.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-12 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020410.190550.83626375.taka@valinux.co.jp.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-10 19:32 ` [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated Andi Kleen
2002-04-11 2:30 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 6:46 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 6:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 7:41 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 7:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 11:38 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 11:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 18:00 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-11 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-11 17:36 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-16 0:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-11 17:33 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-12 8:10 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-12 12:30 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-12 12:35 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-12 21:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-12 21:31 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-04-13 0:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-13 6:39 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-13 8:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-13 19:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-13 19:37 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-13 20:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-24 23:11 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-25 17:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-13 18:52 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-04-14 0:07 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-14 8:19 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-04-14 8:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-12 21:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15 1:30 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-15 4:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 1:03 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-16 1:41 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-16 2:20 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-18 5:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-18 7:58 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-18 8:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19 3:21 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-19 9:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-20 7:47 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-25 12:37 ` Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR. Was " Terje Eggestad
2002-04-26 2:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-26 7:38 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 0:41 ` Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR David Schwartz
2002-04-29 8:06 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 8:44 ` David Schwartz
2002-04-29 10:03 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 10:38 ` David Schwartz
2002-04-29 14:20 ` Terje Eggestad
[not found] ` <200204192128.QAA24592@popmail.austin.ibm.com>
2002-04-20 10:14 ` [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-20 15:49 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-04-10 10:05 Hirokazu Takahashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020412.143150.74519563.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox