Re: Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR. Was Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated

David S. Miller
2002-04-26T02:52:47Z

From: Terje Eggestad <terje.eggestad@scali.com>
Date: 25 Apr 2002 14:37:44 +0200

However writing a test server that stand in blocking wait on a UDP
socket, and start two instances of the server it's ALWAYS the server
last started that get the udp message, even if it's not in blocking
wait, and the first started server is.

Smells like a bug to me, this behavior don't make much sence.

Using stock 2.4.17.

Can you post your test server/client application so that I
don't have to write it myself and guess how you did things?

Thanks.