From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:04:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:04:37 -0400 Received: from stingr.net ([212.193.32.15]:44422 "HELO hq.stingr.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 08:04:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:04:28 +0400 From: Paul P Komkoff Jr To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marc Haber Subject: Re: tulip and VLAN tagging - accepting larger frames without affecting higher layers? Message-ID: <20020413120427.GF28338@stingr.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Haber In-Reply-To: <20020411152327.GA600@stingr.net> <20020413135430.A5521@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Agent Tanya X-Mailer: Roxio Easy CD Creator 5.0 X-RealName: Stingray Greatest Jr Organization: Bedleham International Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Replying to Marc Haber: > Will this patch be in the mainstream kernel soon? Or could it have > negative effects? According to Jeff Garzik, MAINTAINER of tulip driver, negative effects are *unknown* And probability of mainstream tulip being patched like this - too ... :))) -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr // (icq)23200764 // (irc)Spacebar PPKJ1-RIPE // (smtp)i@stingr.net // (http)stingr.net // (pgp)0xA4B4ECA4