public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
To: "Bill Abt" <babt@us.ibm.com>
Cc: drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin.Wirth@dlr.de, "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>,
	"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Futex Generalization Patch
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:22:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020415172204.4B6073FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF24E0B753.2B92A422-ON85256B9C.00512368@raleigh.ibm.com>

On Monday 15 April 2002 10:49 am, Bill Abt wrote:
> Dealing with the realtime signal is not a problem.  Also, saving the extra
> system call is *BIG* bonus.
>
>
> Regards,
>      Bill Abt
>      Senior Software Engineer
>      Next Generation POSIX Threading for Linux
>      IBM Cambridge, MA, USA 02142
>      Ext: +(00)1 617-693-1591
>      T/L: 693-1591 (M/W/F)
>      T/L: 253-9938 (T/Th/Eves.)
>      Cell: +(00)1 617-803-7514
>      babt@us.ibm.com or abt@us.ibm.com
>      http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/pthreads


Cool

As of Peter's initial message. I took a look at the siginfo_t and Peter's 
statement needs to be corrected "a bit".
All the members he listed are NOT necessarily available. 

typedef struct siginfo {
        int si_signo;
        int si_errno;
        int si_code;
 
        union {
                int _pad[SI_PAD_SIZE];
 
                /* kill() */
                struct {
                        pid_t _pid;             /* sender's pid */
                        uid_t _uid;             /* sender's uid */
                } _kill;
 
                /* POSIX.1b timers */
                struct {
                        unsigned int _timer1;
                        unsigned int _timer2;
                } _timer;
 
                /* POSIX.1b signals */
                struct {
                        pid_t _pid;             /* sender's pid */
                        uid_t _uid;             /* sender's uid */
                        sigval_t _sigval;
                } _rt;
 
                /* SIGCHLD */
                struct {
                        pid_t _pid;             /* which child */
                        uid_t _uid;             /* sender's uid */
                        int _status;            /* exit code */
                        clock_t _utime;
                        clock_t _stime;
                } _sigchld;
 
                /* SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS */
                struct {
                        void *_addr; /* faulting insn/memory ref. */
                } _sigfault;
 
                 /* SIGPOLL */
                struct {
                        int _band;      /* POLL_IN, POLL_OUT, POLL_MSG */
                        int _fd;
                } _sigpoll;
        } _sifields;
} siginfo_t;


I'd suggest we tag along the _sigfault semantics.
We don't need to know who woke us up, just which <addr> got signalled.


-- 
-- Hubertus Franke  (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-15 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-15 14:49 [PATCH] Futex Generalization Patch Bill Abt
2002-04-15 16:22 ` Hubertus Franke [this message]
2002-04-15 20:57   ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-15 20:46     ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-16 20:03   ` Peter Wächtler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-10 19:59 Bill Abt
2002-04-10 20:14 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-11 13:55   ` Rusty Russell
2002-04-10 19:30 Bill Abt
2002-04-10 18:47 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-12 15:36   ` Peter Wächtler
2002-04-12 18:48     ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-13 13:52       ` Peter Wächtler
2002-04-15 13:28         ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-10 18:09 Bill Abt
2002-04-10 18:10 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-04  7:52 Rusty Russell
2002-04-04 16:28 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-06  9:48   ` Rusty Russell
2002-04-10 14:24     ` Hubertus Franke
2002-04-10 16:37       ` Rusty Russell
2002-04-10 16:37         ` Hubertus Franke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020415172204.4B6073FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=Martin.Wirth@dlr.de \
    --cc=babt@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox