From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:36:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020416153619.A25328@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020416013016.GA23513@matchmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0204160126510.1960-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:27:26AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:44:58AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > I won't scream too loud, but I think it's pretty much done right as is.
> >
> > Regardless if that's the cleaner implementation or not, I don't see much
> > the point of merging those cleanups in 2.4 right now: it won't make any
> > functional difference to users and it's only a self contained code
> > cleanup, while other patches that make a runtime difference aren't
> > merged yet.
>
> Sorry to say it, but if you want patches to be merged, why
> don't you submit them ?
I submitted these in a past email:
ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.4/2.4.19pre5/vm-33/aa-*
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-15 15:49 [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 20:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 23:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-16 0:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16 1:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 4:27 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 13:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-04-16 13:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16 16:39 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 14:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-16 18:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 4:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-04-16 14:50 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-16 14:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 15:26 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-16 15:46 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-15 21:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-15 21:47 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 22:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-12 0:25 Rik van Riel
2002-04-18 9:41 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-11 18:23 Rik van Riel
2002-04-11 18:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-12 0:07 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020416153619.A25328@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox