From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:44:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020416154418.B25328@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204151400200.13034-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204151415110.15353-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <20020415232058.GO21206@holomorphy.com> <20020416024458.H26561@dualathlon.random> <20020416013016.GA23513@matchmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:30:16PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> under testing. Also, Andrew found a problem with your locking changes when
> he split up your patch, and at the time you were saying it is ready and
> there were no bug reports against in...
btw, it was a problem only for ext3.
> Does this patch conflict in any way with your vm patches? If not they
> should be able to co-exist.
it will generate rejects, but that's not the problem. My point is that
your same argument about merging in later kernels, stable kernel tree,
could be applied to patches that makes no difference to users too.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-15 15:49 [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 20:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-15 23:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-16 0:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16 1:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 4:27 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 13:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16 13:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-04-16 16:39 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 14:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-16 18:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-16 4:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-04-16 14:50 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-16 14:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 15:26 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-16 15:46 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-15 21:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-15 21:47 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-15 22:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-12 0:25 Rik van Riel
2002-04-18 9:41 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-11 18:23 Rik van Riel
2002-04-11 18:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-12 0:07 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020416154418.B25328@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox