public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: "M. R. Brown" <mrbrown@0xd6.org>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux console project <linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Fbdev Bitkeeper repository
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:01:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020416160121.B24069@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10204161542470.29030-100000@www.transvirtual.com> <20020416225752.GA5897@0xd6.org>

> Please tell us that primary framebuffer/input/console development will
> continue in the CVS drop-in tree on SourceForge?  Bitkeeper is unable to
> support this (easier, more efficient) style of development.

Could you please explain why you think CVS is easier and more efficient?
Last I checked, BK was a superset of CVS, but could be used pretty much
identically to CVS if that's what you want.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-16 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-16 22:46 Fbdev Bitkeeper repository James Simmons
2002-04-16 22:57 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " M. R. Brown
2002-04-16 23:01   ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-04-17  0:08     ` M. R. Brown
2002-04-17  1:10       ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-17  2:41         ` M. R. Brown
2002-04-17  3:37           ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-17  5:04             ` M. R. Brown
2002-04-17  6:03               ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-17 12:32                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-04-17 13:52                 ` M. R. Brown
2002-04-17 17:21                   ` James Simmons
2002-04-17 17:54                   ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-17 19:17                     ` M. R. Brown
2002-04-17 16:47             ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-17 17:05               ` Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020416160121.B24069@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=jsimmons@transvirtual.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mrbrown@0xd6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox