From: Adam Kropelin <akropel1@rochester.rr.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Frank Davis <fdavis@si.rr.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@suse.de
Subject: Re: 2.5.8-dj1 : arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c error
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:30:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020417123044.GA8833@www.kroptech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020417024707.GA24105@www.kroptech.com> <2635845054.1018994347@[10.10.2.3]>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:59:08PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> xquad_portio is indeed only for CONFIG_MULTIQUAD. However, you
> shouldn't need the #ifdef's in the code to make this work -
> clustered_apic_mode isn't a variable at all, it's a magic
> trick that's actually 1 or 0 depending on CONFIG_MULTIQUAD.
>
> Look at 2.5.8 virgin, it has the same code.
Not quite.
As I said, -dj has an optimization in asm-i386/io.o:
> #ifdef CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
> extern void *xquad_portio; /* Where the IO area was mapped */
> #else
> #define xquad_portio (0)
> #endif
So the preprocessed smpboot.c contains gems like:
> void *(0) = ((void *)0);
...and...
> (0) = ioremap (0xfe400000,
> numnodes * 0x80000);
Even though clustered_apic_mode is 0, the compiler still complains
about the second one and the first one doesn't depend on
clustered_apic_mode at all.
I don't like spreading around more #ifdef's, but the spirit of the
changes seemed to be to get rid of the declaration of xquad_portio
when !CONFIG_MULTIQUAD. Suggestions for improvement welcome.
--Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-17 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-16 2:19 2.5.8-dj1 : arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c error Frank Davis
2002-04-17 2:47 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-04-17 4:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-17 12:30 ` Adam Kropelin [this message]
2002-04-17 12:40 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-04-17 15:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-17 19:17 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-04-17 19:31 ` Rick Stevens
2002-04-17 20:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-17 20:40 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-04-17 21:17 ` Rick Stevens
2002-04-17 21:49 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-04-17 22:06 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-18 0:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-18 2:16 ` Stevie O
2002-04-17 20:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-17 22:56 ` Stevie O
2002-04-18 0:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-21 13:37 ` [PATCH] " Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020417123044.GA8833@www.kroptech.com \
--to=akropel1@rochester.rr.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=fdavis@si.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox