From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] Linux 2.4.19-pre7-jam1
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:19:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204191319.46292.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204190340450.20646-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Friday 19 April 2002 09:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote:
> > No uptodate O(1) patch for 2.4. Very sad. So there isn't any change to
> > see a current preemption patch on top of vm33 and O(1).
> >
> > [...]
> > I'm under the impression that "all" development is focused on 2.5.x, now.
>
> well, 2.5's scheduler bits were pretty much in flux in the past two months
> or so, partly due to the preemption feature going in. And there are a
> number of other changes in the pipeline as well. So what makes sense for
> 2.4 is Robert's plan: to backport O(1)+preempt once 2.5 is slowing down,
> that way we get the proper testing of both components, instead of a
> separated scheduler patch that doesnt even exist in that form in 2.5.
Thank you very much for your answer Ingo.
It was somewhat still around you. So I was not sure if we have to be worry
about you.
OK, you are fine.
Regards,
Dieter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-19 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-18 23:36 [PATCHSET] Linux 2.4.19-pre7-jam1 Dieter Nützel
2002-04-18 23:44 ` Robert Love
2002-04-19 0:04 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-04-19 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-04-19 11:19 ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-17 0:03 J.A. Magallon
2002-04-17 0:21 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-04-17 13:40 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-17 17:23 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-04-18 8:11 ` Heinz Diehl
2002-04-18 19:27 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-18 19:34 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-04-18 19:53 ` Erik Andersen
2002-04-18 20:16 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-04-19 5:52 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-19 14:05 ` Heinz Diehl
2002-04-19 20:30 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200204191319.46292.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox