public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank de Lange <lkml-frank@unternet.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:35:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org> (raw)

Hi'all,

Anyone remember this thread:

   "severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access"

   http://hypermail.spyroid.com/linux-kernel/archived/2001/week52/0266.html

It describes the tendency of 2.4 series kernels to slowdown under I/O load.
Well, that problem still seems to be alive and kicking. And no, it is not
related to reiserfs as I previously suggested in this thread:

   "Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus", archived here:

   http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0111.1/0911.html

I removed the last reiserfs partition quite some time ago, currently running
mostly ext3 with ext2 root fs.

The systems use IDE disks, I don't have any SCSI-systems handy to test whether
this might be IDE-only (anyone?). Currently running 2.4.18 (with preempt and
lowlatency, but the problems are NOT related to those patches as they also hit
unpatched kernels) on SMP (Abit BP-6 yeah yeah I know but it does not seem to
be specific to the BP-6).

Does anyone else see these problems? Specifically, does anyone with a
SCSI-based system see this happening? Also, does anyone who uses only ext2 (no
ext3 or reiserfs, let alone jfs/xfs or any other journaling fs) see this?

Cheers//Frank

 [ BTW: I'm moving to Sweden, and am looking for a project/job in Västra
   Götaland, preferrably Göteborg... Anyone know anything interesting? ]
-- 
  WWWWW      ________________________
 ## o o\    /     Frank de Lange     \
 }#   \|   /                          \
  \ `--| _/     <Hacker for Hire>      \
   `---'  \                            /
           \ lkml-frank@unternet.org  /
            `------------------------'
 [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
    et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est."  ]

             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-19 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-19 17:35 Frank de Lange [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-19 18:04 severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited) Frank de Lange
2002-04-19 23:07 Shane

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org \
    --to=lkml-frank@unternet.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox