From: Frank de Lange <lkml-frank@unternet.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:35:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org> (raw)
Hi'all,
Anyone remember this thread:
"severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access"
http://hypermail.spyroid.com/linux-kernel/archived/2001/week52/0266.html
It describes the tendency of 2.4 series kernels to slowdown under I/O load.
Well, that problem still seems to be alive and kicking. And no, it is not
related to reiserfs as I previously suggested in this thread:
"Abysmal interactive performance on 2.4.linus", archived here:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0111.1/0911.html
I removed the last reiserfs partition quite some time ago, currently running
mostly ext3 with ext2 root fs.
The systems use IDE disks, I don't have any SCSI-systems handy to test whether
this might be IDE-only (anyone?). Currently running 2.4.18 (with preempt and
lowlatency, but the problems are NOT related to those patches as they also hit
unpatched kernels) on SMP (Abit BP-6 yeah yeah I know but it does not seem to
be specific to the BP-6).
Does anyone else see these problems? Specifically, does anyone with a
SCSI-based system see this happening? Also, does anyone who uses only ext2 (no
ext3 or reiserfs, let alone jfs/xfs or any other journaling fs) see this?
Cheers//Frank
[ BTW: I'm moving to Sweden, and am looking for a project/job in Västra
Götaland, preferrably Göteborg... Anyone know anything interesting? ]
--
WWWWW ________________________
## o o\ / Frank de Lange \
}# \| / \
\ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \
`---' \ /
\ lkml-frank@unternet.org /
`------------------------'
[ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-19 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-19 17:35 Frank de Lange [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-19 18:04 severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited) Frank de Lange
2002-04-19 23:07 Shane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020419193507.A17439@unternet.org \
--to=lkml-frank@unternet.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox