Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

Doug Ledford
2002-04-22T21:31:05Z

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:25:37PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> To imply that the BK doc is an intentioned advertisement is silly.
> It's in the kernel source tree to help people with, like it or not, what
> is a part of kernel development. An _optional_ part.

Which is *exactly* why it belongs with the kernel docs, and not on
bitkeeper's web site. It's an optional part of the kernel process, and
just because BK has a license some people don't like is no reason to
*not* document how that optional process works.

--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606