Re: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change

Andreas Dilger
2002-04-22T22:32:41Z

On Apr 22, 2002 00:14 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 22 April 2002 23:35, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > So that leaves a more selective approach. We can add a clause that says
> > we reserve the right to insist you either
> >
> > a) maintain your changes in public within 90 days of making them, or
>
> That's going beyond what the gpl requires. Nobody needs to share their
> changes unless they distribute the binaries.

But according to the license under which they use BK, they _do_ need to
make them public.

> > If you have a better idea on how to shut down the abusers without scaring
> > the legit users, I'm all ears.
>
> No need to play mall cop.

Isn't that you calling the kettle black? ;-)

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger