Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

[CaT <cat@zip.com.au>]

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:50:14PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big
> > > and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If
> > > this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not
> > > get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with
> > 
> > I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the
> > lk list when it gets new work.  Linus?
> 
> Horse, barn.  We need a solution that works before the patch gets applied.
> 
> Perhaps that's what you're talking about?

That's what I meant. Email gets sent out to LKML when the patch gets sent
to BK for approval by Linus. Another email can then be sent out (unless
it's felt that it's too verbose to do so) when Linus accepts it into the
tree. (unless I'm missing something about BK ;)

-- 
			       DANGEROUS TREND:
	  American Children Are Trying to Masturbate With Electronic
			 Abdominal Exercise Machines!
	     http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0302/abtoner.html