Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22T14:38:36Z

On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:36, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
> > > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
> > > > > since forgotten the password to my old helsinki.fi account ;),
> > > >
> > > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.
> > >
> > > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer
> > > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated
> > > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do
> > > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim.
> >
> > So the offer was not in good faith.
>
> Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through
> the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged
> on, and refuse to substantiate?

Yes.

--
Daniel