Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Larry McVoy
2002-04-21T18:37:28Z

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:21, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
> > > > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
> > > > since forgotten the password to my old helsinki.fi account ;),
> > >
> > > Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.
> >
> > Larry hereby retracts his offer until you back up your claims and answer
> > the questions you have been asked. You've made one unsubstantiated
> > claim after another and when challenged, you tell the challenger to do
> > the legwork to support your unsubstantiated claim.
>
> So the offer was not in good faith.

Like I said, Daniel, put up or shut up. Would you like me to go through
the thread and come up with a list of claims you have made, been challenged
on, and refuse to substantiate?

We can discuss the good-faith issue *after* you answer the questions.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm