Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Jeff Garzik
2002-04-21T15:36:57Z

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:46:16AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
>
> > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
>
> well, this raises an interesting point...
>
> should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
> not?

No, it doesn't raise this point. Documentation is licensed either
separately, or with the package containing it. As it is here.

There is no "should it be regarded" questions.

Jeff