Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Larry McVoy
2002-04-21T17:40:50Z

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was
> > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply
> > > because there is a real point to it.
> >
> > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway. The part that's
> > missing is the discussion. Just looking at the recent traffic... there's
>
> Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big
> and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If
> this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not
> get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with

I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the
lk list when it gets new work. Linus?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm