public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rpm <rajendra.mishra@timesys.com>
To: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>,
	Nikita@Namesys.COM, Andrey Ulanov <drey@rt.mipt.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FPU, i386
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:39:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204251310.g3PD9dI00738@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204171440.JAA76065@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>

On Wednesday 17 April 2002 08:10 pm, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> ---------  Received message begins Here  ---------
>

> if (int(1/h * 100) == int(5.0 * 100))
>
> will give a "proper" result within two decimal places. This is still
> limited since there are irrational numbers within that range that COULD
> still come out with a wrong answer, but is much less likely to occur.
>
> Exact match of floating point is not possible - 1/h is eleveated to a
> float.
>
> If your 1/h was actually num/h, and num computed by summing .01 100 times
> I suspect the result would also be "wrong".
>

why is exact match of floating point not possible ?
what i understand is if you  do a  " x/y " (where x and y are two integers ) 
division in hardware then you should always get the same value , then why 
can't we compare floating point "==" operation ?
   I understand that in case of inrrational number it will not give a exact 
value ......but division like 1/.2 is not irrational ! and it should always 
come to 5 !
 
rpm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-25 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-17 14:40 FPU, i386 Jesse Pollard
2002-04-17 14:49 ` John Alvord
2002-04-18  8:31 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-25 13:09 ` rpm [this message]
2002-04-25 13:22   ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-25 14:22   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-25 15:24     ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-25 16:08       ` Richard B. Johnson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-29 16:19 Kerl, John
2002-04-26 22:10 Kerl, John
2002-04-29 12:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
     [not found] <scc7dcc8.053@mail-02.med.umich.edu>
2002-04-25 14:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-25 14:38 Nicholas Berry
2002-04-17 14:05 Andrey Ulanov
2002-04-17 14:20 ` Mike Black
2002-04-17 14:26 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-17 14:29 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-17 15:20 ` Gunther Mayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200204251310.g3PD9dI00738@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rajendra.mishra@timesys.com \
    --cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
    --cc=drey@rt.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox