From: rpm <rajendra.mishra@timesys.com>
To: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>,
Nikita@Namesys.COM, Andrey Ulanov <drey@rt.mipt.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FPU, i386
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:39:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204251310.g3PD9dI00738@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204171440.JAA76065@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 08:10 pm, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> --------- Received message begins Here ---------
>
> if (int(1/h * 100) == int(5.0 * 100))
>
> will give a "proper" result within two decimal places. This is still
> limited since there are irrational numbers within that range that COULD
> still come out with a wrong answer, but is much less likely to occur.
>
> Exact match of floating point is not possible - 1/h is eleveated to a
> float.
>
> If your 1/h was actually num/h, and num computed by summing .01 100 times
> I suspect the result would also be "wrong".
>
why is exact match of floating point not possible ?
what i understand is if you do a " x/y " (where x and y are two integers )
division in hardware then you should always get the same value , then why
can't we compare floating point "==" operation ?
I understand that in case of inrrational number it will not give a exact
value ......but division like 1/.2 is not irrational ! and it should always
come to 5 !
rpm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-25 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-17 14:40 FPU, i386 Jesse Pollard
2002-04-17 14:49 ` John Alvord
2002-04-18 8:31 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-25 13:09 ` rpm [this message]
2002-04-25 13:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-25 14:22 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-25 15:24 ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-25 16:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-29 16:19 Kerl, John
2002-04-26 22:10 Kerl, John
2002-04-29 12:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
[not found] <scc7dcc8.053@mail-02.med.umich.edu>
2002-04-25 14:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-25 14:38 Nicholas Berry
2002-04-17 14:05 Andrey Ulanov
2002-04-17 14:20 ` Mike Black
2002-04-17 14:26 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-17 14:29 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-17 15:20 ` Gunther Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200204251310.g3PD9dI00738@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rajendra.mishra@timesys.com \
--cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
--cc=drey@rt.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox