* [patch] Re: gdb stopped working in 2.5.10 - works fine in 2.4.x
2002-04-26 12:57 gdb stopped working in 2.5.10 - works fine in 2.4.x Jurriaan on Alpha
@ 2002-04-26 14:07 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ivan Kokshaysky @ 2002-04-26 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jurriaan on Alpha; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Richard Henderson, linux-kernel
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:57:36PM +0200, Jurriaan on Alpha wrote:
> the breakpoint with a negative number, followed by the message 'Cannot
> access memory at ...' happens on any executable I try with gdb.
>
> This didn't happen with the 2.4.x kernels, so I suspect something in
> 2.5.x. Any ideas?
Yes, gdb and strace are broken since 2.5.6, IIRC.
Some necessary 'thread_info' changes still are missing in ptrace.c.
Fix appended.
Ivan.
--- 2.5.9/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c Sun Apr 14 23:18:55 2002
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c Mon Apr 15 18:36:43 2002
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ get_reg_addr(struct task_struct * task,
zero = 0;
addr = &zero;
} else {
- addr = (long *)((long)task + regoff[regno]);
+ addr = (long *)((long)task->thread_info + regoff[regno]);
}
return addr;
}
@@ -340,9 +340,9 @@ sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long
if ((unsigned long) data > _NSIG)
goto out;
if (request == PTRACE_SYSCALL)
- set_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
else
- clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
child->exit_code = data;
wake_up_process(child);
/* make sure single-step breakpoint is gone. */
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long
goto out;
/* Mark single stepping. */
child->thread_info->bpt_nsaved = -1;
- clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
wake_up_process(child);
child->exit_code = data;
/* give it a chance to run. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread