First working version of suspend-to-RAM

First working version of suspend-to-RAM

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 373 bytes --]

Hi!

Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to
combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that
you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-).
									Pavel
-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa

[-- Attachment #2: combined.2.diff#gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 36773 bytes --]

Re: First working version of suspend-to-RAM

[Stelian Pop]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:17:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to
> combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that
> you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-).

Could you please reread Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially
these 2 points:
  * No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.
  * usage of 'dontdiff'

I'm sure this will help people try out your patch and give you
feedback...

Thanks,

Stelian.
-- 
Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com>
Alcove - http://www.alcove.com

Re: First working version of suspend-to-RAM

[David S. Miller]

   From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
   Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:21:18 +0100 (BST)

   > Could you please reread Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially
   > these 2 points:
   >   * No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.
   >   * usage of 'dontdiff'
   
   Thats just Linus preference.

And also a DaveM preference. :-)

Re: First working version of suspend-to-RAM

[Stelian Pop]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:21:18AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Could you please reread Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially
> > these 2 points:
> >   * No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.
> >   * usage of 'dontdiff'
> 
> Thats just Linus preference.

Agreed, but only for the MIME part.

> A lot of us prefer to get stuff in attachments
> because that way there is a reasonable chance their mailer won't have 
> eaten it

MIME or not, I still prefer having an uncompressed patch attached.

But the most important comment was the 'dontdiff' one however...

Stelian.
-- 
Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com>
Alcove - http://www.alcove.com

Re: First working version of suspend-to-RAM

[Alan Cox]

> Could you please reread Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially
> these 2 points:
>   * No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.
>   * usage of 'dontdiff'

Thats just Linus preference. A lot of us prefer to get stuff in attachments
because that way there is a reasonable chance their mailer won't have 
eaten it