[bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Vojtech Pavlik]

ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
  This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
  the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
  on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.


 Config.help |    7 -------
 Config.in   |   13 ++++++-------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/Config.help b/drivers/ide/Config.help
--- a/drivers/ide/Config.help	Sun Apr 28 14:22:55 2002
+++ b/drivers/ide/Config.help	Sun Apr 28 14:22:55 2002
@@ -299,13 +299,6 @@
 
   It is normally safe to answer Y; however, the default is N.
 
-CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP
-  If you enable this you will be able to use and test highly
-  developmental projects. If you say N, the configurator will
-  simply skip those options.
-
-  It is SAFEST to say N to this question.
-
 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC_ADMA
   Please read the comments at the top of <file:drivers/ide/ide-pci.c>.
 
diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/Config.in b/drivers/ide/Config.in
--- a/drivers/ide/Config.in	Sun Apr 28 14:22:55 2002
+++ b/drivers/ide/Config.in	Sun Apr 28 14:22:55 2002
@@ -47,18 +47,17 @@
 	 dep_bool '      Use PCI DMA by default when available' CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
          dep_bool '    Enable DMA only for disks ' CONFIG_IDEDMA_ONLYDISK $CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO
 	 define_bool CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
-	 dep_bool '    ATA Work(s) In Progress (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
-	 dep_bool '    Good-Bad DMA Model-Firmware (WIP)' CONFIG_IDEDMA_NEW_DRIVE_LISTINGS $CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP
+	 dep_bool '    Drive DMA black/whitelist (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_IDEDMA_NEW_DRIVE_LISTINGS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    AEC62XX chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AEC62XX $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_mbool '      AEC62XX Tuning support' CONFIG_AEC62XX_TUNING $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AEC62XX
 	 dep_bool '    ALI M15x3 chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
-	 dep_mbool '      ALI M15x3 WDC support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_WDC_ALI15X3 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3
+	 dep_mbool '      ALI M15x3 WDC support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_WDC_ALI15X3 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    AMD and nVidia chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_bool '    CMD64X chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_bool '    CY82C693 chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CY82C693 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_bool '    Cyrix CS5530 MediaGX chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5530 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
   	 dep_bool '    HPT34X chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT34X $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
-	 dep_mbool '      HPT34X AUTODMA support (WIP)' CONFIG_HPT34X_AUTODMA $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT34X $CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP
+	 dep_mbool '      HPT34X AUTODMA support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_HPT34X_AUTODMA $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT34X $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    HPT366 chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_bool '    Intel and Efar (SMsC) chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 if [ "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX" = "y" ]; then
@@ -68,15 +67,15 @@
 	    dep_mbool '    IT8172 IDE support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT8172 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	    dep_mbool '      IT8172 IDE Tuning support' CONFIG_IT8172_TUNING $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT8172 $CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO
 	 fi
-	 dep_bool '    NS87415 chipset support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
+	 dep_bool '    NS87415 chipset support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    OPTi 82C621 chipset enhanced support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OPTI621 $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
-	 dep_mbool '    Pacific Digital A-DMA support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC_ADMA $CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP
+	 dep_mbool '    Pacific Digital A-DMA support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC_ADMA $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    PROMISE PDC202{46|62|65|67|68|69|70} support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
 	 dep_bool '      Special UDMA Feature' CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX
 	 dep_bool '      Special FastTrak Feature' CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX
 	 dep_bool '    ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 chipsets support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SVWKS $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI $CONFIG_X86
 	 dep_bool '    SiS5513 chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIS5513 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI $CONFIG_X86
-	 dep_bool '    Tekram TRM290 chipset support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
+	 dep_bool '    Tekram TRM290 chipset support (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290 $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
 	 dep_bool '    VIA chipset support' CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX $CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI
       fi
 

===================================================================


This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
+
## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##


begin 664 bkpatch10736
M'XL(`)_IRSP``[56[V_:2!#]C/^*D7I2[]1B]H>-;21.I9A+K1*"@#3YAC;V
M!N_%]EJV$ZXG__&W-@%2:LK1NX!!8IF=]W;>O+'?P'7.LU[K2?Y9<#_4WL`G
MF1>]5K$6D5B%A?[HKW7_;[4^DU*M=T(9\\YS=.?NH2,"WB:ZJ:F(*2O\$)YX
MEO=:6*>[E>)KRGNMV>CB>CR8:5J_#\.0)2L^YP7T^UHALR<6!?D'5H213/0B
M8TD>\X+IOHS+76A)$"+J;6*+(K-;XBXRK-+'`<;,P#Q`Q+"[AO9,[</!`0[S
M&,3&!&/LE`:U;4=S`>NFA0&1#C(ZQ`9L]`CI4?H.D1Y"<"0MO"/01MI'^'\/
M,=1\6(0BAXS'\HGG4(0<AE>3/[R+I>>.W,O!<CKTEC?>%&1:")F\5Y%IQ'R1
MK$`4L!9%J%)4NV*9<5`<8IEL,XQNIZ.9=SF:+`9C';P"6)1+8$&0`X.`ISSQ
MU?55)5![?FG8!.N0JZRQR',%J&N?0171,K7I7EBM?>9+TQ!#VN^05BW37,4@
M$U5S52W7&<KD7JSTD$?IMJ9=A+"%:8D<9)&2V9P9=^K3]9EEXV,"_CAIW26$
M4%R2KN.8BMZ/=6Y()I(7FAL(*\VI0VA)L<,,Q\<*!%/#8><0W.;<TZ/J%ZJM
M=>0\E=%>J;1'+7>ZM,J`5FF8EDUJ`V+S.__A4_Y#T+9>Q7^SVGK*0QELO5:Q
M?P^)!(6PXADDG`<\J/I_TQY7T,[6]:7Z>7I,BI^PAJOT!>N8OB(Y/4;_0V>>
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L"1;\(6,Q+&:7Q$'G%N)YU[EUV#TS^B'W'_+'N*\\;"*+<NT?A^+?3ZH*````
`
end

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Martin Dalecki]

Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
> ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
>   This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
>   the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
>   on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.


All fine and all will be taken. However please note that
I don't use BK and I don't intend too. My rejection of
it isn't based on any idiotic policy - I found it just ugly to
use and I was confused about the beta-alpha versions
offered on the web site - too much work in progress for my taste.
Finally I don't entrust source code to programmers who even don't know
the difference between TCP and UDP and use TCP becouse they don't know better.
I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-).

Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Martin Dalecki]

Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
> ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
>   This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
>   the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
>   on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.


Fine. However one has to hit the default configuration files
as well.

Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Martin Dalecki]

Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:35:50PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
> 
>>Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
>>
>>>ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
>>>  This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
>>>  the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
>>>  on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.
>>
>>
>>All fine and all will be taken. However please note that
>>I don't use BK and I don't intend too. My rejection of
>>it isn't based on any idiotic policy - I found it just ugly to
>>use and I was confused about the beta-alpha versions
>>offered on the web site - too much work in progress for my taste.
>>Finally I don't entrust source code to programmers who even don't know
>>the difference between TCP and UDP and use TCP becouse they don't know better.
> 
> 
> Ok - your decision. If you want, I'll omit the BK part of the patches.
> On the other hand, if you could just forward it to Linus as is (or let
> me send it to Linus after your confirmation), change comments won't get
> lost. 
> 
> 
>>I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-).
> 
> 
> It's included, anyway.

Yes but why the hell should I bother looking at some uu-encoded stuff?
Jet another reason I think BK is plain ugly.
Anyway. Please send the chipset parts to linus directly. They seem
fine. However the _WIP change is despite beeing correct, not complete
and I will prefer to do it myself. OK?

Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Vojtech Pavlik]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:35:50PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:

> Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
> > ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
> >   This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
> >   the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
> >   on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.
> 
> 
> All fine and all will be taken. However please note that
> I don't use BK and I don't intend too. My rejection of
> it isn't based on any idiotic policy - I found it just ugly to
> use and I was confused about the beta-alpha versions
> offered on the web site - too much work in progress for my taste.
> Finally I don't entrust source code to programmers who even don't know
> the difference between TCP and UDP and use TCP becouse they don't know better.

Ok - your decision. If you want, I'll omit the BK part of the patches.
On the other hand, if you could just forward it to Linus as is (or let
me send it to Linus after your confirmation), change comments won't get
lost. 

> I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-).

It's included, anyway.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Vojtech Pavlik]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:49:10PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:

> > Ok - your decision. If you want, I'll omit the BK part of the patches.
> > On the other hand, if you could just forward it to Linus as is (or let
> > me send it to Linus after your confirmation), change comments won't get
> > lost. 
> > 
> >>I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-).
> > 
> > It's included, anyway.
> 
> Yes but why the hell should I bother looking at some uu-encoded stuff?
> Jet another reason I think BK is plain ugly.
> Anyway. Please send the chipset parts to linus directly.
> They seem fine. 

Ok, I'll send the two changes to Linus.

> However the _WIP change is despite beeing correct, not complete
> and I will prefer to do it myself. OK?

Perfect.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs