From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: davej@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.x-dj and SCSI error handling.
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:37:49 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200204290737.JAA17086@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200204271630.g3RGUgF04840.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> from "Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl" at "Apr 27, 2002 06:30:42 pm"
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> > The recent patch from Christoph Hellwig which kills off
> > the last remaining remnants of the old style SCSI error handling.
> > ...
>
> Is the new scsi-eh generally regarded as a good thing?
Oh, and if someone is working in the area of "error handling", please,
please allow me to turn off "retries". That's not going to cost much
in terms of code or performance, but increadably valuable for me: We
do datarecovery. So we regularly have "bad" disks in here, and when
the drive reports an error on block <N> we would much rather have the
drive try block <N+1> than have the OS retry block <N>. (Chances of
block <N> getting results is lower than about 5% (given that the drive
has reported an error for that block), while in general the chances of
a random block getting recovered is better than 99%)
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots.
* There are also old, bald pilots.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-29 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-27 16:30 linux-2.5.x-dj and SCSI error handling Andries.Brouwer
2002-04-27 18:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-29 7:37 ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-27 18:00 Douglas Gilbert
2002-04-27 14:31 Douglas Gilbert
2002-04-27 11:10 Dave Jones
2002-04-27 11:26 ` arjan
2002-04-27 13:48 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-04-27 13:52 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200204290737.JAA17086@cave.bitwizard.nl \
--to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox