Re: The tainted message

Bob_Tracy
2002-04-27T16:29:13Z

Alan Cox wrote:
> > I would like to propose that a clearer, more direct message be used.
> > Something like "Warning: kernel maintainers may not support your kernel
> > since you have loaded %s: %s%s\n" would be much more informative and
> > correct.
>
> More informative but I think too soft. It still implies we might want to
> hear about it but not reply. That isnt the case.

What you say is true enough if you speak for yourself and/or the core
cadre of kernel maintainers. On the other hand, the linux-kernel list
has been and mostly continues to be a good place to get help with
problems related to kernel changes that affect non-GPL modules.

To put it another way, the kernel developers aren't necessarily the
target audience when a request for assistance is posted to linux-kernel.
If that was too subtle, kernel developers aren't the only people who
read linux-kernel. Is linux-kernel an appropriate venue for such
assistance requests? Maybe not the *most* appropriate one, but it's
often the most efficient. Let me put it this way: speaking for myself,
I don't ask linux-kernel list readers for help with a problem if the
problem isn't the immediate result of a kernel change.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org
rct@frus.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------