public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* What compiler to use
@ 2002-04-30 11:33 Frank Schaefer
  2002-04-30 11:43 ` Gabor Kerenyi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Schaefer @ 2002-04-30 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi all,

I plan to build a linux box for kernel development (only). Which
compiler would you suggest me to use?
As of today I'm using gcc-2.95.3 on all my production machines. Is this
still the preferred compiler for kernel work, or should I change to
3.0.x?

Thanks in advance
Frank





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What compiler to use
  2002-04-30 11:33 What compiler to use Frank Schaefer
@ 2002-04-30 11:43 ` Gabor Kerenyi
  2002-04-30 12:10   ` Frank Schaefer
  2002-04-30 13:11   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gabor Kerenyi @ 2002-04-30 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Schaefer, linux-kernel

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 20:33, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> I plan to build a linux box for kernel development (only). Which
> compiler would you suggest me to use?
> As of today I'm using gcc-2.95.3 on all my production machines. Is this
> still the preferred compiler for kernel work, or should I change to
> 3.0.x?

I use 2.95.2 for the test machine and gcc-3.1 from cvs on the other. There's 
no problem.
gcc-3.1 gives a bit more warning. (I use 3.1 at home also)
but don't try to use gcc 3.2 because the kernel won't compile in some cases.

Gabor


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What compiler to use
  2002-04-30 11:43 ` Gabor Kerenyi
@ 2002-04-30 12:10   ` Frank Schaefer
  2002-04-30 13:11   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frank Schaefer @ 2002-04-30 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 13:43, Gabor Kerenyi wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2002 20:33, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > I plan to build a linux box for kernel development (only). Which
> > compiler would you suggest me to use?
> > As of today I'm using gcc-2.95.3 on all my production machines. Is this
> > still the preferred compiler for kernel work, or should I change to
> > 3.0.x?
> 
> I use 2.95.2 for the test machine and gcc-3.1 from cvs on the other. There's 
> no problem.
> gcc-3.1 gives a bit more warning. (I use 3.1 at home also)
> but don't try to use gcc 3.2 because the kernel won't compile in some cases.
> 
> Gabor
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
Thanks
Frank


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What compiler to use
  2002-04-30 11:43 ` Gabor Kerenyi
  2002-04-30 12:10   ` Frank Schaefer
@ 2002-04-30 13:11   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  2002-04-30 13:32     ` Christian Bornträger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2002-04-30 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gabor Kerenyi; +Cc: Frank Schaefer, linux-kernel

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Gabor Kerenyi wrote:

> On Tuesday 30 April 2002 20:33, Frank Schaefer wrote:
> > I plan to build a linux box for kernel development (only). Which
> > compiler would you suggest me to use?
> > As of today I'm using gcc-2.95.3 on all my production machines. Is this
> > still the preferred compiler for kernel work, or should I change to
> > 3.0.x?
> 
> I use 2.95.2 for the test machine and gcc-3.1 from cvs on the other. There's 
> no problem.
> gcc-3.1 gives a bit more warning. (I use 3.1 at home also)
> but don't try to use gcc 3.2 because the kernel won't compile in some cases.

Is this common knowledge? Is 3.1 as stable as 2.95.[23] for compiling the 
kernel? Does it make any difference in performace?

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: What compiler to use
  2002-04-30 13:11   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2002-04-30 13:32     ` Christian Bornträger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Bornträger @ 2002-04-30 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Gabor Kerenyi; +Cc: Frank Schaefer, linux-kernel

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Is this common knowledge? Is 3.1 as stable as 2.95.[23] for compiling the
> kernel? Does it make any difference in performace?

Not quite.

http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-2

Gcc 2.95.3 is the recommended compiler for kernel 2.4.10 and later. 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-30 13:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-30 11:33 What compiler to use Frank Schaefer
2002-04-30 11:43 ` Gabor Kerenyi
2002-04-30 12:10   ` Frank Schaefer
2002-04-30 13:11   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-04-30 13:32     ` Christian Bornträger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox