From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 07:33:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 07:33:27 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:14602 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 07:33:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 13:33:25 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Rusty Russell Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] TRIVIAL 2.5.12 WP security warning Message-ID: <20020501133325.G29327@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Rusty Russell , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:23:47PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > Pavel Machek : Warn users about machines with non-working WP bit: > Hi! > > This might be good idea, as those machines are not safe for multiuser > systems. > > - printk("No.\n"); > + printk("No (that's security hole).\n"); > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK Maybe be a little more explicit in the wording ? "No. This system is insecure in a multiuser environment.\n" perhaps ? -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs