From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: dalecki@evision-ventures.com
Cc: arjanv@redhat.com, rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:48:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020502.104817.06390889.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CD16F03.9090900@evision-ventures.com>
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 18:53:23 +0200
And then think about the fact that they are able to even *patch*
running kernels. There is no way I can be convinced that the whole
versioning stuff is neccessary or a good design for any purpose.
Hint: they never changes their ABIs for drivers. This is why
they can't fix several large scale bugs in their OS. When the
fix would break every third party Solaris driver on the planet
they simply don't do the fix until the next major relase of the
OS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-01 14:23 kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel Keith Owens
2002-05-02 15:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-02 10:38 ` tomas szepe
2002-05-02 12:21 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-02 12:49 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 14:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 13:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 14:54 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-02 15:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-05 9:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-05 10:16 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-02 15:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-05-02 15:59 ` Richard Gooch
2002-05-02 15:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 17:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 16:30 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 18:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 17:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-05-02 16:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 17:48 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-05-02 17:42 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 19:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 18:22 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 18:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-02 18:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 14:24 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-02 15:18 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-02 15:40 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-02 23:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-02 23:25 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-03 14:48 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-03 15:45 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-02 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-03 8:33 ` Vikram
2002-05-03 12:07 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 1:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-18 1:33 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-18 3:06 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-18 12:28 ` [PATCH] move jiffies from sched.h to it's own jiffies.h Tim Schmielau
2002-05-19 22:33 ` Tim Schmielau
2002-05-20 2:32 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-18 2:12 ` kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel Gerhard Mack
2002-05-18 2:13 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 2:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-20 2:38 ` Miles Bader
2002-05-02 21:34 ` tomas szepe
2002-05-02 21:42 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-03 1:19 ` John Covici
2002-05-03 1:33 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-03 1:39 ` tomas szepe
2002-05-03 2:31 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-03 3:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-05-02 21:42 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-02 23:25 ` tomas szepe
2002-05-03 21:05 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-05-04 13:58 ` Kurt Wall
2002-05-06 1:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-02 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-03 9:00 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-03 4:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-05-03 5:02 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-03 6:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-05-03 10:06 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-05-03 10:42 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-03 12:05 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-05-03 13:31 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-04 6:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-04 8:03 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-06 0:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-06 4:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-04 9:03 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-04 9:38 ` Russell King
2002-05-04 10:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-04 11:49 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-06 8:40 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-05-07 4:14 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-04 15:30 ` Richard Gooch
2002-05-05 17:23 ` Urban Widmark
2002-05-05 23:36 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-06 11:33 ` Urban Widmark
2002-05-06 23:54 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-06 10:54 ` Alex Riesen
2002-05-08 2:54 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-08 17:25 ` Alex Riesen
2002-05-09 0:10 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-09 0:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-09 1:44 ` Keith Owens
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-05 16:42 Dan Kegel
2002-05-05 23:44 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-06 0:02 ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 0:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-06 15:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-06 15:33 ` Tomas Szepe
[not found] <cs.lists.linux-kernel/18740.1020729269@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
2002-05-07 23:48 ` Ion Badulescu
2002-05-08 0:10 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-08 0:37 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-08 0:34 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020502.104817.06390889.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox