From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 08:48:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 08:48:05 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:43530 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 08:48:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 14:48:04 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Rudmer van Dijk Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.12-dj1 Message-ID: <20020502144804.A16935@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Rudmer van Dijk , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20020501203612.GA4167@suse.de> <20020502110625.3DFA41EF73@Cantor.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 01:06:07PM +0200, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: > drivers/block/block.o: In function `ramdisk_updatepage': > drivers/block/block.o(.text+0x3740): undefined reference to > `mark_buffer_uptodate' The chunk of code introduced to the ramdisk code in 2.5.12-dj1 is a forward port of what happened in 2.4. It probably needs fixing up again (I've rewritten and jiggled it a little since the initial forward port). I'm not entirely sure it works as advertised anymore. It's on my radar, I'll take a look for the next patch I put out. Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs