From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 10:56:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 10:56:15 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:26630 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 10:56:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:11 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Andreas Dilger , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: ext2 errors under fsx with 2.5.12-dj1. Message-ID: <20020502165611.L16935@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Andreas Dilger , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20020502143250.GA19533@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:32:50PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext2_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not > in datazone - block = 2553887680, count = 1 Ugh, I figured out how this was caused, and its somewhat pathological. What the script should have been doing was two parallel fsx's one on hdb1 and the other on hdb2. Mounted on /mnt/test-hdb1 and /mnt/test-hdb2 Due to a screwup in the script I wrote, both were mounting on /mnt/test net result: chaos as 1 fsx process had another mount another partition over the top of it. With the script corrected, it seems to be playing well. Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs