From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IDE hotplug support?
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 23:13:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020502231359.W31556@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020502215833.V31556@unthought.net> <E173N9y-0004k1-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >=20
> > > 8 x 130MBy/s >>>> PCI bus throughput... I would rather recommend
> > > a classical RAID controller card for this kind of
> > > setup.
> >
> > Because RAID controllers do not use the PCI bus ??? ;)
>
> The raid card transfers the data once, software raid once per device for
> Raid 1/5 - thats a killer.
For RAID-1 it's a killer (for writes), I agree.
But I really doubt it would be so horrible for RAID-5 - after all, it's only
one extra block (the parity block) for each N-1 blocks written (for an N disk
RAID-5). The penalty should be less, the more disks you have in the array.
But seriously, has anyone out there ever seen a hardware RAID controller with
a *sustained* RAID-5 thoughput of more than 60 MB/sec ? Not that I think it
is impossible, but I've never heard about it. Enlighten me, please, and not
with marketing numbers...
>
> > By the way, has anyone tried such larger multi-controller setups, and t=
> > ested
> > the bandwidth in configurations with multiple PCI busses on the board, =
> > versus a
> > single PCI bus ?
>
> With 2.4 yes. With all the 2.5 changes no.
Did you get any speedup ? Were you close to PCI bus saturation in the one-bus
scenario ?
--
................................................................
: jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-02 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-30 15:48 IDE hotplug support? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-04-26 15:29 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-02 18:19 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 19:58 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-02 20:09 ` Samuel Flory
2002-05-03 0:31 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-03 3:14 ` jw schultz
2002-05-02 20:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-02 21:13 ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2002-05-02 20:18 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-02 22:22 ` Jeff Nguyen
2002-05-02 23:09 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-03 0:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-03 0:35 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-03 17:10 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-03 0:25 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-03 0:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-03 0:37 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-04-30 16:22 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-04-30 18:46 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020502231359.W31556@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox