From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 01:17:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020502231751.GA2003@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E173QdG-0000bs-00@w-gerrit2>
On 2002.05.03 Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
>In message <20020502173656.A26986@rushmore>, > : rwhron@earthlink.net writes:
>> On an OSDL 4 way x86 box the O(1) scheduler effect
>> becomes obvious as the run queue gets large.
>>
>> 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 and 2.4.19-pre7-jam6 have the O(1) scheduler.
>>
>> At 192 processes, O(1) shows about 340% improvement in throughput.
>> The dyn-sched in -aa appears to be somewhat improved over the
>> standard scheduler.
>>
>> Numbers are in MB/second.
>>
>
>If you are bored, you might compare this to the MQ scheduler
>at http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lse/2.4.14.mq-sched
>
>Also, I think rml did a backport of the 2.5.X version of O(1);
>I'm not sure if htat is in -ac or -jam as yet.
>
-jam6 is sched-O1-rml-2 (the backport).
>Rumor is that on some workloads MQ it outperforms O(1), but it
>may be that the latest (post K3?) O(1) is catching up?
>
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre7-jam9 #2 SMP mié may 1 12:09:38 CEST 2002 i686
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-02 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-02 21:36 O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192 rwhron
2002-05-03 0:09 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-02 23:17 ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2002-05-03 0:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-03 1:08 ` Gerrit Huizenga
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-03 13:38 rwhron
2002-05-03 20:29 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-05-04 8:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 22:13 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-07 22:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 22:43 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-07 23:39 ` Robert Love
2002-05-07 23:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-08 15:34 ` Jussi Laako
2002-05-08 16:31 ` Robert Love
2002-05-08 17:02 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-09 0:26 ` Jussi Laako
2002-05-08 8:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-09 23:18 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-03 16:37 John Hawkes
2002-05-06 8:20 rwhron
2002-05-06 16:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-08 16:39 Bill Davidsen
2002-05-20 12:46 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020502231751.GA2003@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox