From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 02:29:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 02:29:30 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:32290 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 02:29:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 08:30:09 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Roman Zippel Cc: Daniel Phillips , Ralf Baechle , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: discontiguous memory platforms Message-ID: <20020503083009.W11414@dualathlon.random> In-Reply-To: <3CD184BB.ED7F349F@linux-m68k.org> <3CD19640.3B85BF76@linux-m68k.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:40:48PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > mapping won't be one to one, but you won't need another abstraction and > the current vm is already basically able to handle it. this was basically my whole point, agreed. Andrea